-
Blog
- IN FINNISH: Lähdesmäki: Matti Nykänen katoaa lööpeistä 2030
August 19, 2010
- Design oriented approach in Agile SW development the best of two worlds
May 3, 2010
- IN FINNISH: Apple iPad, ensikokemukset
April 4, 2010
- Five Trends for 2010
January 14, 2010
- IN FINNISH: Viisi nousevaa trendiä
January 12, 2010
- Internet Marketing Guide Book (in Finnish)
December 22, 2009
- October Newsletter - Lokakuun uutiskirje
October 30, 2009
- Work, work, work
October 27, 2009
- Teaching the old dog some new tricks
September 9, 2009
- New Finnish Guide for Internet Marketing Coming Up
September 4, 2009
- IN FINNISH: Lähdesmäki: Matti Nykänen katoaa lööpeistä 2030
Agile or waterfall – some pros and cons from USiX perspective
Friday, December 19, 2008
Is there a room for agile methods in user interaction (USiX) projects? Can an iterative process be adopted without irritating designers? Coming up with usable and cool-looking user interfaces is a highly creative tasks which should not be tampered with. Still, there must be an alternative to plain waterfall process.
In this blog entry, Santtu Toivonen discusses some benefits and drawbacks of waterfall and agile methods, in particular from the USiX perspective.
Share your experiences and read the full blog entry in Tietoviikko (in Finnish).
[...] bookmarks tagged agile Idean » Agile or waterfall – some pros and cons… saved by 4 others EverybodyONEartH bookmarked on 12/23/08 | [...]
Sari and Karri Laakso from Interacta have been thinking about this very problem for a while. Their streamlined GUIDe process is inspired by Alan Cooper’s methodologies. Unfortunately, a description is only available in Finnish. ://www.interacta.fi/guide.html